The 25 most recent blog posts about ASP.NET MVC indexed by AspDotNetMVC.com. http://aspdotnetmvc.com/blogs/ en-us Copyright © 2010 AspDotNetMVC.com. All Rights Reserved Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:39:00 GMT http://backend.userland.com/rss Community Server v2.0 (http://www.communityserver.org) In ASP.Net MVC there does not seem an easy way to validate form at client side. Using jQuery with ASP.Net MVC we can achieve that easily. First of all add jQuery and jQuery validation plugin file into project and include them in master page file or add below code to page. <script type="text/javascri <b>...</b> <br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://itshala.com/2010/03/13/asp-net-mvc-client-side-validation-example-using-jquery/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=asp-net-mvc-client-side-validation-example-using-jquery IT Shala Mitesh Sheta Mitesh Sheta c57bd4ac1a924fae49dc4979241588a1 Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:39:00 GMT Hot on the heels of the release of ASP.NET MVC 2 yesterday, I’m happy to announce that we are releasing the source code to ASP.NET MVC 2 under the Ms-PL license, an OSI approved Open Source license. This continues the trend from nearly a year ago when we released ASP.NET MVC 1.0 under the Ms-PL. You <b>...</b> <br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://haacked.com/archive/2010/03/12/ms-pl-source-release-for-system-web-mvc-2.aspx you've been HAACKED Haacked Haacked 0031148e6a4aa9746012f0a124f10c35 Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:22:00 GMT Download the source code and futures assembly, too. <br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://davidhayden.com/blog/dave/archive/2010/03/12/AspNetMvc2SourceCodeFuturesDownload.aspx David Hayden - Florida .NET Developer - C# and SQL Server Dave Hayden Dave Hayden bb8ff4e0457b794f2abcf2ac95a47da9 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:45:00 GMT It’s that time of year again when the sakura (cherry blossoms) bloom and allergies kick into high gear. When the drive home is no longer shrouded in darkness and when the ASP.NET team releases Software! Earlier today we released the RTM of ASP.NET MVC 2 for Visual Studio 2008 SP1. See Scott Guthrie’ <b>...</b> <br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://haacked.com/archive/2010/03/11/aspnet-mvc2-released.aspx you've been HAACKED Haacked Haacked ef59edb1d8012a70b3e4e478e480cc77 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:42:00 GMT <p>There&#39;s a <a href="http://www.asp.net/learn/videos/video-9639.aspx">new video</a> up on www.asp.net which aims to help developers pick between ASP.NET WebForms and ASP.NET MVC. The video boils down to 5 benefits per technology which Microsoft thinks you should consider.</p> <p>Let&#39;s go over the points, shall we? First, ASP.NET WebForms:</p> <h4 style="margin-bottom:0px;padding-bottom:0px;">1 - Familiar control and event base programming model</h4> <p>The claim here is that the ASP.NET model is comfortable for WinForm programmers (thankfully this unbiased analysis left out <b>who</b> it&#39;s more familiar for). This is largely accurate, but disingenuous. The differences between web and desktop cannot be overstated nor can one overstate how bad ASP.NET&#39;s (or any other framework) is at hiding the difference. &quot;Familiar&quot; is probably the right word to use so long as you recognize that, in this case, at best it means: superficial; at worst: a serious pain in the ass. Your knowledge of building a VB6 app will allow you to write a &quot;Hello World&quot; web application - great. </p> <p>Familiarity can be a liability when it tries to force a square peg into a round hole.</p> <p>It also largely relies on your inability (or unwillingness) to learn. Today, next month or even next year may not be the right time for you to learn something new - that&#39;s fine. Eventually, sticking with what you know, only because you know it, will kill your career and possibility part of your spirit.</p> <h4 style="margin-bottom:0px;padding-bottom:0px;">2 - Controls encapsulate HTML, JS and CSS</h4> <p>It&#39;s true that in ASP.NET WebForms controls can, and frequently do, encapsulate HTML, JS and CSS. How this ads &quot;value&quot; is beyond me. You can&#39;t, and shouldn&#39;t, be trying to build website without a solid command of HTML, JS and CSS. Whatever programming language and framework you use, the ultimate output of any website is HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Your server code essentially generates a stream of characters, which a browser loads and renders. To suggest, or think, that generating HTML, CSS or JavaScript in C# has any advantage is insane. It&#39;ll be more complicated to learn, do and maintain - and the end result will be inferior. Its like saying we should write C# in VB.NET; or drive cars by bolting planes to the roof and getting in the cockpit.</p> <h4 style="margin-bottom:0px;padding-bottom:0px;">3 - Rich UI controls included - datagrids, charts, AJAX.</h4> <p>Point 3 is a different perspective on point 2, which is a different way of saying point 1. However, it is the most interesting and important perspective. Fancy tables and charts, as well as client-side behavior, shouldn&#39;t be a server-side concern. This is fundamental to what we all know about good and bad design. Classic ASP was a mess because it intermingled presentation code with server side code. The value of WebForms is that presentation logic is now a server side concern. Do you really believe this? Would you consider generating your HTML from a stored procedure? </p> <p>The claim also implies that by using ASP.NET MVC, you won&#39;t be able to have a rich UI. In truth, you won&#39;t only have access to a wider range of controls; you&#39;ll also avoid a bunch of poor abstractions, and generate JavaScript by writing JavaScript, css by writing css and html by writing html.</p> <h4 style="margin-bottom:0px;padding-bottom:0px;">4 - Browser differences handled for you</h4> <p>I&#39;m guessing that the claim is that some of the controls mentioned in point 3 might render different HTML based on the requesting browser. Guess what, most jQuery (or any other js framework) plug-ins are fully compatible with all relevant browsers because they too can generate different HTML. In fact, doing this on the client side is almost always better - since you can tell the exact capabilities of a browser.</p> <p>Also, it would probably be better if you generated correct HTML, CSS and JS in the first place - something you can&#39;t normally control using ASP.NET WebForms. So not only is this really just a benefit because IE is a pain, but its only worth mentioning because points #1, #2 and #3 mean that you&#39;ve lost complete control over doing it right in the first place.</p> <h4 style="margin-bottom:0px;padding-bottom:0px;">5 - SharePoint builds on WebForms</h4> <p>Yes, if you use SharePoint, you&#39;ll have to use WebForms. </p> <p>Now on to ASP.NET MVC:</p> <h4 style="margin-bottom:0px;padding-bottom:0px;">1 - Feels comfortable for many traditional web developers</h4> <p>ASP.NET WebForms is familiar while ASP.NET MVC is comfortable - that&#39;s helpful. Nonetheless, when I see &quot;traditional&quot; I think &quot;not-modern&quot;. A more honest counterpoint to the WebForms claim would be: &quot;A more natural way to build web applications&quot;. WebForms tried to help WinForm developer&#39;s transition to the web. ASP.NET MVC is a model that better reflect the realities of programming on the web. It&#39;s more than just comfort, and has nothing to do with tradition.</p> <h4 style="margin-bottom:0px;padding-bottom:0px;">2 - Total control of HTML markup</h4> <p>HTML, JS and CSS are yours to command. That doesn&#39;t mean you can&#39;t use controls to speed up development and improve your applications. The way this is worded sure makes it sound like MVC is a lot more work than WebForms though. It isn&#39;t.</p> <h4 style="margin-bottom:0px;padding-bottom:0px;">3 - Supports Unit Testing, TDD and Agile methodologies</h4> <p>I&#39;m not sure what the technology stack has to do with the development methodology, so we&#39;ll just ignore the last part. That aside, its true that MVC makes it possible to unit test your code. The counter point to that is that WebForms is essentially impossible to unit test. This also understates the architectural superiority and design of MVC - its doesn&#39;t only allow you to leverage a number of best practices, it itself is actually built around those same practices. Code that can be unit tested, regardless of whether it is or not, is almost always superior to code that cannot.</p> <h4 style="margin-bottom:0px;padding-bottom:0px;">4 - Encourages more prescriptive applications</h4> <p>So if ASP.NET MVC lets you build you application the way you should be building it, should you infer that ASP.NET WebForm forces you to build applications the wrong way? Yes, you should.</p> <h4 style="margin-bottom:0px;padding-bottom:0px;">5 - Extremely flexible and extensible</h4> <p>Both frameworks share this value - but ASP.NET MVC is more about building on top of existing code, while ASP.NET WebForms is more about hacking things until they work. If you think this means that ASP.NET MVC can only be useful once you&#39;ve extended it, then you are wrong. It works great out of the box is is feature rich.</p> <h4 style="margin-bottom:0px;padding-bottom:0px;">Other Stuff</h4> <p>The video goes on to make weird assertions, like the possibility of turning back and picking a different stack if you feel you&#39;ve made the wrong choice because of how similar and how much infrastructure they share. The better solution is to pick the right technology because going back months or years into your project doesn&#39;t sound like good advice to me.</p> <p>It also mentions that it&#39;s common to have some pages handled by MVC and others by WebForms. It&#39;s good to know that you can do this - especially since it&#39;s a good way to upgrade from WebForms to MVC. However, I&#39;d hardly call it common or even recommended. It&#39;s a useful transitional tool which you should aim to get out of as quickly as possible.</p> <p>Ultimately, the first 4 values of WebForms all boil down to the same thing: there&#39;s a <code>System.Web.UI</code> namespace which represents the wrong way to build a web app. There are good reasons to pick WebForms - but they all come down to time and practicalities of learning new things (and SharePoint). I won&#39;t tell you that you have to learn MVC, because that may not be practical for you. I&#39;ll repeat what I&#39;ve said before, ASP.NET MVC and WebForms DO NOT serve different purposes and one is not better suited for a particular type of application than the other(except SharePoint). They are completely overlapping technologies, and ASP.NET MVC is superior to WebForms.</p><br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://codebetter.com/blogs/karlseguin/archive/2010/03/11/webforms-vs-mvc-again.aspx karl karl d21fbbc9-c112-4f32-ad14-95939a2c53d4:669981 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:12:00 GMT I'm a Software Developer, a testing advocate, blogger, speaker (kinda), nerd, and disc golfer. I try to create quality, solid software and write about it when I think I've done something good.<br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://www.lostechies.com/blogs/chrismissal/archive/2010/03/10/one-year-of-production-asp-net-mvc.aspx Chris Missal Chris Missal http://www.lostechies.com/blogs/chrismissal/archive/2010/03/10/one-year-of-production-asp-net-mvc.aspx Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:20:00 GMT Better Array Model Binding in <b>ASP.Net MVC</b>. I have found that the DefaultModelBinder, when binding to arrays, has an irritating quirk; dare I say bug? If the array is already instantiate in the model, the model binder will attempt to ...<br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://blog.baltrinic.com/dotnet/better-array-model-binding-in-asp-net-mvc Ken Ken http://blog.baltrinic.com/dotnet/better-array-model-binding-in-asp-net-mvc Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:50:00 GMT Talks about updates to <b>mvc</b>.spaanjaars.com, my work-in-progres <b>MVC</b> application.<br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://imar.spaanjaars.com/QuickDocId.aspx?QUICKDOC=519 Imar Spaanjaars Imar Spaanjaars http://imar.spaanjaars.com/QuickDocId.aspx?QUICKDOC=519 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:09:19 GMT One of the great new features in <b>ASP.NET MVC</b> 2 is the Template system. It is very similar to the template form helper system introduced in MvcContrib for <b>MVC</b> V1. For more information on the <b>MVC</b> template system read Brad Wilsons ...<br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://www.codinginstinct.com/2010/03/aspnet-mvc-and-convention-based-forms.html Torkel Ödegaard Torkel Ödegaard http://www.codinginstinct.com/2010/03/aspnet-mvc-and-convention-based-forms.html Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:58:00 GMT By default, MVC doesn’t remember your ModelState from one request to the next. ... StateServer mode, which stores session state in a separate process called the ASP. NET state service....<br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://blog.jorritsalverda.nl/2010/03/10/maintainable-mvc-post-redirect-get-pattern blog.jorrit salverda.nl http://blog.jorritsalverda.nl/2010/03/10/maintainable-mvc-post-redirect-get-pattern Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:47:04 GMT I’ve been told that these programming posts are not interesting or funny. For those that have no interest in programming, I offer the following jokes: “Chuck Norris can divide by zero” “Chuck Norris can touch MC Hammer” “Chuck Norris CAN believe it's not butter.” – Chuck Norris Facts Now would be a <b>...</b> <br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://blog.wassupy.com/2010/03/building-urls-for-src-attributes-in.html Michael Haren Michael Haren Michael Haren d74bff4970c3729433b6bd8f17b96f10 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:01:00 GMT Okay, so we've got this awesome new Swiss Army Knife toolkit and framework that allows us to feel like web ninjas: <b>ASP.NET MVC</b>. Sure, the <b>MVC</b> bits have been kerplunking around for a couple of years, but there is a cycle that tools and ...<br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://theycallmemrjames.blogspot.com/2010/03/visual-studio-2010-wishlist.html ChipOne ChipOne http://theycallmemrjames.blogspot.com/2010/03/visual-studio-2010-wishlist.html Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:20:00 GMT Deleporter is a little .NET library that teleports arbitrary delegates into an ASP.NET application in some other process (e.g., hosted in IIS) and runs them there. At the moment, it’s still pretty experimental, but I’ve found it useful so far. Why would you want this? It’s mainly useful when you’re <b>...</b> <br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://blog.stevensanderson.com/2010/03/09/deleporter-cross-process-code-injection-for-aspnet/ Steve Sanderson's blog Steve Steve 85d3111df00016a9b0f0a4cec32a7f1d Tue, 09 Mar 2010 07:52:00 GMT I’m starting a new series of blogs posts on profiling, where we’ll try and cover common bottlenecks and how to identify them in your applications. However, before delving deeper into the subject, let me make a small but important observation: Your bottleneck is probably not your for loop Now, replac <b>...</b> <br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://devlicio.us/blogs/hadi_hariri/archive/2010/03/09/profiling-apps-1-of-n-the-mvc-actionlink.aspx Devlicio.us - Just the Tasty Bits Hadi Hariri Hadi Hariri d1f8c2740c0617ec14a1a508e420580c Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:34:00 GMT Gotta love the idea that one can create a view engine in ASP.NET MVC! <br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://davidhayden.com/blog/dave/archive/2010/03/08/SharpyAspNetViewEngine.aspx David Hayden - Florida .NET Developer - C# and SQL Server Dave Hayden Dave Hayden 0668628acab295354f3516c99bd07689 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:18:00 GMT In a previous post I explained some of the issues with ASP.NET MVC when trying to implement an SEO-optimized web site. In this post I’ll begin to explore some possible solutions. Step 1: Master View – some additions First let’s make it easy to set the meta description, page title, meta keywords and <b>...</b> <br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://blog.abodit.com/2010/03/asp-net-mvc-seo-solution-part-1/ Ian Mercer Ian Ian a45437b25918cb2f7563fce108dd42b0 Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:43:00 GMT <b>ASP.NET MVC</b> Filters and Model Binders Intro Tour. I thought the next stop on my <b>MVC</b> tour would be Filters and Model Binders. Since I am still grokking some of these bits – nothing detailed here, but wanted to share what I have found so ...<br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://cantgrokwontgrok.blogspot.com/2010/03/aspnet-mvc-filters-and-model-binders.html Rob The Geek Rob The Geek http://cantgrokwontgrok.blogspot.com/2010/03/aspnet-mvc-filters-and-model-binders.html Sun, 07 Mar 2010 06:32:00 GMT <B>ASP</B>.<B>NET</B> <B>MVC</B> 2 futures assembly provides a HTML helper method Serialize that can be use for persisting your model object. <br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://weblogs.asp.net/shijuvarghese/archive/2010/03/06/persisting-model-state-in-asp-net-mvc-using-html-serialize.aspx http://weblogs.asp.net/shijuvarghese/archive/2010/03/06/persisting-model-state-in-asp-net-mvc-using-html-serialize.aspx Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:04:00 GMT We updated the browser definitions files included with <b>ASP.NET</b> 4 to include information on recent browsers and devices such as Google Chrome and the iPhone. You can use these browser definition files with earlier versions of <b>ASP.</b> ...<br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://stephenwalther.com/blog/archive/2010/03/05/use-asp.net-4-browser-definitions-with-asp.net-3.5.aspx Stephen Walther Stephen Walther http://stephenwalther.com/blog/archive/2010/03/05/use-asp.net-4-browser-definitions-with-asp.net-3.5.aspx Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:22:16 GMT I’m going to do a series on how I’ve set up a number of <B>ASP</B>.<B>NET</B> <B>MVC</B> projects for customers with very high-traffic sites and continuously changing...<br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://blog.jorritsalverda.nl/2010/02/09/maintainable-mvc-series-introduction/ http://blog.jorritsalverda.nl/2010/02/09/maintainable-mvc-series-introduction/ Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:16:00 GMT In our ASP.Net MVC application we want to separate the presentation code associated with HTML views from the act of binding data to HTML controls. We also want to get more of the UI control generation under test. This is our latest refinement towards those goals. Html page for Address: <div> <%= Mod <b>...</b> <br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://shashankshetty.wordpress.com/2010/03/05/separation-of-concerns-in-input-builders/ Shashank's Blog shashankshetty shashankshetty 0f06aae1ce7c81478fe7f58a176044f7 Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:56:00 GMT This post arrives to you today from the awesome Hotel Dunn Inn in beautiful San Jose, Costa Rica! Best. Beds. Ever. It was time to clear the brain and work on.<br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://www.billsternberger.net/asp-net-mvc/update-textbox-with-asp-net-mvc-jquery/ bill sternberger bill sternberger http://www.billsternberger.net/asp-net-mvc/update-textbox-with-asp-net-mvc-jquery/ Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:45:23 GMT Test Automation Pyramid in ASP.NET MVC This is a reposting of my comments from Mike Cohn’s Test Automation Pyramid I often use Mike’s Test Automation Pyramid to explain to clients’ testers and developers how to structure a test strategy. It has proved the most effective rubric (say compared with the <b>...</b> <br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://blog.goneopen.com/2010/03/test-automation-pyramid-asp-net-mvc/ the tar pit todd todd 9d9ea4eebbfe64c3b9f6416058aa79bd Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:51:00 GMT Obviously, S#arp Architecture is the bee's knees when it comes to developing ASP.NET MVC applications. ;) But as a project evolves and gets larger, "out of the box" S#arp Architecture 1.0 guidance runs into a few pain points. Particularly, there's poor use of the application services layer, the sepa <b>...</b> <br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://devlicio.us/blogs/billy_mccafferty/archive/2010/03/05/better-application-services-and-cqs-with-s-arp-architecture-1-0-q3-2009.aspx Devlicio.us - Just the Tasty Bits Billy McCafferty Billy McCafferty afea66ab290173366f45754532d79432 Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:47:00 GMT Contact Form with <b>ASP.NET MVC</b>, Castle Validation, & fluentHtml. Here's another little tutorial for those of you new to <b>MVC</b> &/or fluentHtml. I figure I'll do these little tutorials until I find a new project to work on. ...<br /><div id="postfooter"><hr />Thanks for subscribing to AspDotNetMVC.com.<br />Make sure you checkout the newly added <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com/books/" title="ASP.NET MVC Books Page">ASP.NET MVC Books page</a>.</div> http://derans.blogspot.com/2010/03/contact-form-with-aspnet-mvc-castle.html noreply@blogger.com (Deran Schilling) noreply@blogger.com (Deran Schilling) http://derans.blogspot.com/2010/03/contact-form-with-aspnet-mvc-castle.html Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:43:00 GMT